Which of the following is NOT an exception to the warrant requirement for inspections?

The rationale behind identifying routine inspections of personal property as not an exception to the warrant requirement for inspections is grounded in the constitutional protection against unreasonable searches. The Fourth Amendment establishes the principle that searches and seizures usually require a warrant based on probable cause, except in specified circumstances.

In cases of routine inspections, especially of personal property, the expectation of privacy is high. Individuals typically maintain a strong right to privacy in their homes and personal belongings, which makes routine inspections without a warrant constitutionally questionable.

In contrast, the other options reflect established exceptions where warrants may not be necessary. For instance, inspections in public view do not invade a reasonable expectation of privacy, and consent means that an individual allows the inspection to occur. Similarly, closely regulated businesses, like liquor stores or pawn shops, have a lower expectation of privacy due to the nature of their operations and the regulatory environment they operate within. Each of these exceptions aligns with legal precedents that seek to balance individual privacy rights with the government's interests in regulation and safety.

Therefore, routine inspections of personal property stand apart as they typically require a warrant unless another specific justifying circumstance exists, making this option a clear choice as not being an exception to the warrant requirement.