Which method can an agency use to compel compliance from individuals?

An agency can compel compliance from individuals effectively by refusing to accept applications for licenses or benefits. This method serves as a significant regulatory tool as it directly impacts an individual’s ability to operate legally within certain sectors or to access specific benefits. Most individuals and businesses require licenses or permits to engage in regulated activities, and the denial of these applications leads to a substantial incentive for compliance with the agency's regulations.

When individuals understand that non-compliance could result in being unable to obtain necessary licenses or benefits, they are more likely to adhere to the regulations set forth by the agency. This method emphasizes the agency's authority and the consequences of failing to meet established standards, thereby ensuring that compliance is prioritized.

In contrast, issuing legal opinions, while informative, does not compel individuals to act. Automatically granting licenses might lead to higher non-compliance rates as it lacks the disciplinary effect of a refusal. Providing financial incentives can encourage compliance but does not hold the same regulatory power as the threat of denial of access to necessary resources. Thus, the method of refusal reinforces the agency's role in enforcing compliance through its control over essential licensing and benefits.