What is a primary safeguard against abuses of power by an administrative agency?

Judicial review serves as a primary safeguard against abuses of power by an administrative agency because it allows courts to evaluate the legality and constitutionality of agency actions. When an individual or entity believes that an agency has overstepped its authority or violated statutory or constitutional provisions, they can challenge the agency's decision in court. This process not only helps to protect individual rights but also ensures that agencies act within the scope of their delegated powers.

Judicial review promotes accountability by providing a mechanism for oversight of administrative actions. Courts examine the actions of agencies for compliance with the law, thereby checking any potential overreach or arbitrary decision-making. In this way, judicial review maintains the rule of law and ensures that administrative agencies do not impose unfair or unjust actions upon individuals or entities.

Other options, such as public opinion surveys, annual budget audits, and executive orders, serve different purposes and do not provide the same level of legal accountability as judicial review. Public opinion surveys can influence agency actions but do not have the authority to reverse or check an agency's power through legal means. Annual budget audits focus on financial accountability rather than checks on power and may not consider the legality of agency actions. Executive orders, issued by a president, are directives that can dictate administrative policy but do