What does discretion allow to an administrator or board in administrative law?

Discretion in administrative law refers to the authority granted to administrators or boards to make decisions within the framework of existing laws and regulations. It allows them the freedom to interpret guidelines and apply them to individual cases, considering the specific circumstances involved. This flexibility is crucial in ensuring that administrative bodies can tailor their decisions to the nuances of particular situations while still operating within legal boundaries.

Choosing "freedom to make decisions based on guidelines" captures the essence of how discretion functions. It emphasizes that administrators are not entirely unrestricted; they must operate within the framework of established laws and guidelines. This balance ensures that decisions are informed and contextual rather than capriciously made, promoting fairness and consistency in administrative processes.

The other options do not accurately represent the nature of administrative discretion. For instance, the notion of making arbitrary decisions without accountability contradicts the requirement for reasoned decision-making in administrative law, which is subject to oversight. Similarly, enforcing laws irrespective of regulations overlooks the need for adherence to the specific regulatory framework guiding administrative actions. Lastly, the idea of altering established law misrepresents the concept of discretion, as it focuses on interpretation and implementation rather than changing legal standards outright.