Can a court review a suspension of licenses that were previously granted?

In administrative law, the principle of judicial review allows courts to evaluate the actions of administrative agencies, including decisions regarding the suspension of licenses. When a license has been granted and then suspended, courts generally have the authority to review that suspension to ensure that due process has been followed and that the agency acted within the scope of its statutory authority.

The correct answer affirms that courts can indeed review suspensions of licenses that were previously granted, reinforcing the notion that individuals have a right to appeal administrative actions that might infringe on their rights. This role of the court is essential in maintaining checks and balances in the relationship between regulatory agencies and individuals, reinforcing the rule of law and ensuring that administrative decisions are fair, reasonable, and based on adequate evidence.

The other choices may imply limitations on judicial review that do not accurately reflect the broad principle of reviewability in administrative law. For instance, stating that review is only possible under specific circumstances or upon request from the agency overlooks the general right of affected individuals to seek redress when a government action adversely affects them.